From b70a215c616a061047e624fb9c8b51d1ce806e73 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ben Holden-Crowther Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:48:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] "BlackBox" vs "blackbox" --- Version2-Ideas.md | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Version2-Ideas.md b/Version2-Ideas.md index cd71bb2..b538d29 100644 --- a/Version2-Ideas.md +++ b/Version2-Ideas.md @@ -1,12 +1,12 @@ -# Ideas for blackbox Version 2 +# Ideas for BlackBox Version 2 I'm writing this to solicit feedback and encourage discussion. -Here are my thoughts on a "version 2" of blackbox. This is where +Here are my thoughts on a "version 2" of BlackBox. This is where I list ideas that would require major changes to the system. They might break backwards compatibility, though usually not. -Blackbox grew from a few simple shell scripts used at StackOverflow.com +BlackBox grew from a few simple shell scripts used at StackOverflow.com to a larger system used by dozens (hundreds?) of organizations. Not all the design decisions were "forward looking". @@ -94,4 +94,4 @@ However, I've never used it so I don't have any idea whether git-crypt is any be Of course, git-crypt doesn't work with SVN, HG, or any other VCS. Is blackbox's strong point the fact that it support so many VCS systems? To be honest, it originally only supported HG and GIT because I was at a company that used HG but then changed to GIT. Supporting anything else was thanks to contributors. Heck, HG support hasn't even been tested recently (by me) since we've gone all git where I work. -How important is this to blackbox users? +How important is this to BlackBox users?